Porisma

Worked solution

Prove a cotangent derivative and distinguish a reciprocal from an inverse

Prove that d(cot⁡x)/dx=−csc⁡2xd(\cot x)/dx=-\csc^2x.

CJC · Lecture · Example 8

Follow the printed reciprocal-tangent method

Where both sides are defined, cot⁡x=1/tan⁡x=(tan⁡x)−1\cot x=1/\tan x=(\tan x)^{-1}. Differentiating gives −(tan⁡x)−2sec⁡2x=−sec⁡2x/tan⁡2x=−1/sin⁡2x=−csc⁡2x-(\tan x)^{-2}\sec^2x=-\sec^2x/\tan^2x=-1/\sin^2x=-\csc^2x, the printed proof. This particular route initially requires both sin⁡x≠0\sin x\ne0 and cos⁡x≠0\cos x\ne0.

How did this part go?

Check the whole domain of cotangent

Cotangent itself is defined wherever sin⁡x≠0\sin x\ne0, including points where cos⁡x=0\cos x=0 and the printed reciprocal-tangent expression is undefined. An independently authored quotient-rule proof avoids that restriction: d(cos⁡x/sin⁡x)/dx=[−sin⁡2x−cos⁡2x]/sin⁡2x=−csc⁡2xd(\cos x/\sin x)/dx=[-\sin^2x-\cos^2x]/\sin^2x=-\csc^2x. Thus the claimed formula holds on the full cotangent domain.

How did this part go?

Read the source notation warning

The yellow note in both copies distinguishes the reciprocal (tan⁡x)−1=1/tan⁡x(\tan x)^{-1}=1/\tan x from the inverse function tan⁡−1x=arctan⁡x\tan^{-1}x=\arctan x. These are not the same function. The source points to section 3.9.1 for inverse functions; its principal domains and ranges are now included in this chapter’s inverse-trigonometric guidance.

How did this part go?

Common mistakes

A −1 exponent applied to a value denotes a reciprocal; inverse-function notation has a different meaning.

Solution notes

Printed asks and complete working compared with both source copies. No printed marks or past-paper attribution. Domain explanations independently authored where the source leaves them implicit.

Read the hint