Worked solution
Find the significance levels that reject a claim
At an early stage in analysing the marks scored by a large number of candidates in an examination paper, the Examining Board takes a random sample of 250 candidates and finds that their marks satisfy and . Using these figures, the null hypothesis is tested against the alternative at the level of significance. Determine for which the null hypothesis is rejected in favour of the alternative hypothesis.
[1988/II/10]
CJC · Lecture · Example 4
Estimate the sample mean and variance
Let be the population mean examination mark. and . The source rounds this variance to 330.99. Under , use by the large-sample approximation.
Calculate the lower-tail probability
For against , and . The source’s p-value strategy is appropriate because the unknown is the significance level. Its Z-Test Stats screen uses , estimated SD 18.1931305713 from rounded variance 330.99, , , lower alternative; it reports , , printed as 0.040180. These rounded-input/source-algorithm differences are retained separately.
Invert the significance comparison without rounding the set
Rejection requires . Hence , with exact lower endpoint approximately for the full-precision normal approximation. The source’s final is a rounded display of that threshold; it is not the identical set of real significance percentages. If percentages are restricted to 0.01 increments, 4.02% is the least rejecting grid value. The source includes a stray 5% rejection-rule line before solving for ; 5% is not supplied by the question.
Common mistakes
Compare the p-value with α/100, not α. A rounded 4.02% label does not replace the unrounded real lower bound.
Solution notes
Teacher strategy, completed estimates and unknown-α inequality retained. The source’s 5% line is recorded as a copied template line rather than added to the question. No printed marks.