Porisma

Worked solution

Solve a normal interval condition and assess the model

In the problem’s model, birth weights for babies of non-smoking mothers at a hospital are normal with mean 3.05 kg and variance σ2\sigma^2. The hospital’s stated classifications are:

Birth weightClassification in the problem
Below 1.5 kgVery low
1.5 kg to 2.5 kgLow
2.5 kg to 4.0 kgNormal
Above 4.0 kgHigh

(i) A sample suggests 20.2% are in the low category. Assuming this holds for the population, find two possible σ\sigma values to 2 dp and explain why one should be rejected. marks

Babies of smoking mothers have mean 2.80 kg. For the remaining parts, explicitly assume both populations are normal with standard deviation 0.86 kg.

(ii) Three smoking mothers are chosen at random. Find the probability all their babies are outside the normal-weight category, stating a required assumption. marks

(iii) Find the probability that the average weight of two babies of non-smoking mothers differs from twice the weight of one baby of a smoking mother by less than 2 kg. marks

Babies outside the normal category remain in hospital for observation until stable. Depending on treatment and length of stay, hospitalisation cost per baby has mean $2800 and standard deviation $ 500.

(iv) For 50 such babies, find the probability that average cost exceeds $3000. marks

[2019/NJC/II/6]

CJC · Review problems · Question 10

Answer

(i) σ=0.70\sigma=0.70 or 1.56 kg; source prefers 0.70 on modelling grounds. (ii) 0.08820.0882 with independence; (iii) 0.3750.375; (iv) 0.002340.00234.

(i) Retain both mathematical solutions

For X∼N(3.05,σ2)X\sim N(3.05,\sigma^2), solve Φ[(2.5−3.05)/σ]−Φ[(1.5−3.05)/σ]=0.202\Phi[(2.5-3.05)/\sigma]-\Phi[(1.5-3.05)/\sigma]=0.202 for σ>0\sigma>0. The source plots this probability minus 0.202 against σ\sigma. The roots are approximately 0.697235 and 1.559948, hence σ=0.70\sigma=0.70 kg or 1.56 kg to 2 dp.

How did this part go?

(i) Explain the source’s modelling preference

Using the printed rounded values, the source finds about 70% in the normal-weight category for σ=0.70\sigma=0.70 versus 37% for σ=1.56\sigma=1.56. It rejects 1.56 because this would make the outside categories collectively more likely. Its alternative reason is a negative-weight probability of about 0.03 for 1.56 versus about 6.6×10−66.6\times10^{-6} for 0.70. Both roots solve the stated interval equation; preferring the smaller one uses an additional modelling-plausibility criterion. Neither positive-variance normal model literally excludes all negative weights.

How did this part go?

(ii) Use the new stated standard deviation and independence

Now use the explicitly imposed σ=0.86\sigma=0.86, not the value chosen in(i). For Y∼N(2.8,0.862)Y\sim N(2.8,0.86^2), the outside-category probability is 1−P(2.5<Y<4)≈1−0.554931-P(2.5<Y<4)\approx1-0.55493. Assuming independent birth weights, the requested probability is [1−P(2.5<Y<4)]3≈0.0882[1-P(2.5<Y<4)]^3\approx0.0882.

How did this part go?

(iii) Compare a mean with twice one observation

Let independent X1,X2∼N(3.05,0.862)X_1,X_2\sim N(3.05,0.86^2) and Y∼N(2.8,0.862)Y\sim N(2.8,0.86^2). For A=(X1+X2)/2−2YA=(X_1+X_2)/2-2Y, the mean is 3.05−2(2.8)=−2.553.05-2(2.8)=-2.55 and variance is 0.52(2⋅0.862)+22(0.862)=3.32820.5^2(2\cdot0.86^2)+2^2(0.86^2)=3.3282. Thus A∼N(−2.55,3.3282)A\sim N(-2.55,3.3282) and P(∣A∣<2)=P(−2<A<2)≈0.375P(|A|<2)=P(-2<A<2)\approx0.375.

How did this part go?

(iv) Approximate the mean cost

For independent identically distributed costs with mean 2800 and variance 5002500^2, the CLT gives Wˉ∼˙N(2800,5002/50)=N(2800,5000)\bar W\mathrel{\dot\sim}N(2800,500^2/50)=N(2800,5000). Hence P(Wˉ>3000)≈0.00234P(\bar W>3000)\approx0.00234.

How did this part go?

Compare your sketch

Expand diagram

Use the scrollbars or arrow keys to inspect details.

Graph of g(σ)=P(1.5<X<2.5)−0.202 for X normal with mean 3.05 and standard deviationσ>0. It crosses zero at approximately 0.697235 and 1.559948, is positive between the roots and negative outside. Both roots are solutions of the same probability equation; the graph alone does not choose between them.
Graph of g(σ)=P(1.5<X<2.5)−0.202 for X normal with mean 3.05 and standard deviationσ>0. It crosses zero at approximately 0.697235 and 1.559948, is positive between the roots and negative outside. Both roots are solutions of the same probability equation; the graph alone does not choose between them.
Graph of g(σ)=P(1.5<X<2.5)−0.202 for X normal with mean 3.05 and standard deviationσ>0. It crosses zero at approximately 0.697235 and 1.559948, is positive between the roots and negative outside. Both roots are solutions of the same probability equation; the graph alone does not choose between them.

Common mistakes

The word “normal” is both a distribution family and a category label here; the category need not be a mathematical majority. State the extra modelling judgement used to reject a root.

Solution notes

Both roots round as printed: the lower root is 0.697235…, so 0.70 is correct to 2dp. The tiny calculator display was independently checked numerically to avoid a false rounding correction. The model-based rejection is qualified rather than presented as a unique consequence of the interval probability.

Read the hint