Porisma

Worked solution

Connect a cross-product relation to areas and a nonzero linear combination

Relative to the origin OO, three distinct fixed points AA, BB and CC have position vectors a\mathbf a, b\mathbf b and c\mathbf c respectively. It is known that b\mathbf b is a unit vector, ∣a∣=3|\mathbf a|=3, ∣c∣=2|\mathbf c|=2 and the angle AOCAOC is 60∘60^\circ.

(i) State the geometrical interpretation of ∣b⋅c∣|\mathbf b\cdot\mathbf c|. mark

It is further given that a×2b=b×c\mathbf a\times2\mathbf b=\mathbf b\times\mathbf c.

(ii) Find the ratio of the area of triangle AOBAOB to the area of triangle BOCBOC. marks

(iii) Show that 2a+c=kb2\mathbf a+\mathbf c=k\mathbf b where k∈Rk\in\mathbb R, k≠0k\ne0.

By considering (2a+c)⋅(2a+c)(2\mathbf a+\mathbf c)\cdot(2\mathbf a+\mathbf c), find the exact values of kk. marks

[2016/HCI/Promo/7]

CJC · Discussion · Question 12

Answer

(i) Projection length of c onto b. (ii) Area ratio 1:21:2. (iii) 2a+c=kb2\mathbf a+\mathbf c=k\mathbf b, k=±213k=\pm 2\sqrt{13}.

(i) Interpret the absolute scalar product

Because b is a unit vector, ∣b⋅c∣=∣c⋅b∣|\mathbf b\cdot\mathbf c|=|\mathbf c\cdot\mathbf b| is the nonnegative length of the projection of c onto b. The absolute-value bars in the printed question are essential.

How did this part go?

(ii) Compare the two triangle areas

The given vector relation implies 2∣a×b∣=∣b×c∣2|\mathbf a\times\mathbf b|=|\mathbf b\times\mathbf c|. Both triangle areas are half the corresponding cross-product magnitude, so their ratio is 1:21:2. The areas are nonzero: if both cross products vanished, a and c would both be parallel to nonzero b, contrary to their 60°angle.

How did this part go?

(iii) Establish the linear relationship

Use antisymmetry to rewrite

2a×b−b×c=0,2a×b+c×b=0,(2a+c)×b=0.\begin{aligned}2\mathbf a\times\mathbf b-\mathbf b\times\mathbf c&=\mathbf 0,\\2\mathbf a\times\mathbf b+\mathbf c\times\mathbf b&=\mathbf 0,\\(2\mathbf a+\mathbf c)\times\mathbf b&=\mathbf 0.\end{aligned}

Since b is nonzero, 2a+c=kb2\mathbf a+\mathbf c=k\mathbf b for real k. This combination cannot be zero: ∣2a+c∣≥2∣a∣−∣c∣=4>0|2\mathbf a+\mathbf c|\ge 2|\mathbf a|-|\mathbf c|=4>0. Thus k≠0k\ne 0.

How did this part go?

(iii) Square both sides with a dot product

(2a+c)⋅(2a+c)=k2b⋅b,4∣a∣2+4a⋅c+∣c∣2=k2,36+4(3)(2)cos⁡60∘+4=k2,52=k2.\begin{aligned}(2\mathbf a+\mathbf c)\cdot(2\mathbf a+\mathbf c)&=k^2\mathbf b\cdot\mathbf b,\\4|\mathbf a|^2+4\mathbf a\cdot\mathbf c+|\mathbf c|^2&=k^2,\\36+4(3)(2)\cos 60^\circ+4&=k^2,\\52&=k^2.\end{aligned}

Hence k=±213k=\pm 2\sqrt{13}. Both signs are retained because the statement does not fix the orientation of b.

How did this part go?

Common mistakes

The prompt’s projection expression has absolute-value bars; it is a length, not a signed scalar component. Squaring gives two possible signs for k.

Solution notes

The page image confirms absolute bars in(i), ℝ and k≠0 in(iii), and printed marks 1,2,6. These are extraction losses, not source errors. An explicit nonzero argument supplements the source’s asserted k≠0.

Read the hint