Techniques of integration
← Back to learning units · Complete chapter reading and print view · Open reference notes separately
By the end, you can
- Recognise reverse chain-rule patterns
- Use substitution and integration by parts
- Check antiderivatives by differentiating
about 35 minutes for the lesson · practise at your own pace.
The central idea
The printed outline covers (including ), , , , , , , and , followed by a given substitution and integration by parts. The methods below connect these forms to the worked examples and practice routes.
Integration and differentiation undo each other
If , then ; is the derivative and is the indefinite integral. For example, is equivalent to .
For continuous and a constant , use these basic rules:
| Rule | Printed example |
|---|---|
Use one arbitrary constant for a resulting family on each connected interval. The Teacher highlights continuity and the two inverse-operation rules.
An indefinite integral describes antiderivatives, so include a constant. A substitution changes both the expression and its differential. Integration by parts, , reverses the product rule. Trigonometric identities and partial fractions can simplify an integrand before either method.
Reverse the chain rule
Differentiating gives . Hence
More generally, reverse the derivative of :
Dividing an arbitrary constant by nonzero n+1 leaves an arbitrary constant, so rename it C. The handwritten strategy says to try standard forms first, then use additional techniques if they do not fit. It labels the basic power rule O-level, the composite rule H2-level and this general form not in MF27. Match the inner derivative before applying the rule.
Explore
Compare with . Before integrating, differentiate each exponent and decide whether its derivative accounts for the remaining factor. Try substitution in the first and parts with in the second. Explain what each choice simplifies, then differentiate both proposed answers. A familiar-looking product alone does not determine the method.
Related interactive example
Explore this related example, then return to the prediction task above.
Worked example
: let , so . The result is .
Substituting the expression but leaving the old differential mixes variables.
Check your understanding
Using the given substitution , find . Explain the next method needed after substitution, give the real domain and verify the final answer by differentiation.
Since , the transformed integral is . Parts, treating as , gives . Thus
The original integrand is defined for every real x because . Differentiating the answer gives . The substitution simplifies the composite expression; parts handles the resulting logarithm.
Mastery learning objectives
At the end of this chapter, I should be able to:
Choose a practice question
| Common question type | Lecture examples | Discussion | Review follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integration as anti-differentiation | 1 | 1, 2 | — |
| Composite power, | 2 | 3(a)–(d), 6(a)–(b) | 11(b) |
| Logarithmic derivative | 3 | 3(e)–(g), 6(c) | 11(a) |
| Composite exponential/base-a | 4 | 3(h)–(i) | 6(b), 10(i) |
| Inverse-trig and difference-of-squares forms | 5, 6, 7 | 4 | 11(c) |
| Partial fractions / split numerator | 8, 9, 10 | 5 | 3(a), 12, 13 |
| Trigonometric standard forms | 11 | 6(c) | 11(e) |
| Trigonometric identities | 12, 13, 14, 15 | 6(d)–(e), 12 | 2(i) |
| Substitution | 16 | 7, 11(ii) | 2(ii), 4, 6(a), 8(a), 9, 10(ii), 15(ii), as printed |
| Parts | 17, 18 | 8, 9, 10, 11(i) | 1, 3(b), 5, 8(b), 11(d), 14, 15(i), as printed |
The printed power-map condition n≠1 is corrected to n≠−1 here, consistent with the preceding derivation. The printed map refers to Review15(i)/(ii), although Review15has one ask; the two-method parts/substitution comparison is Review16(i)–(iii). These source references remain visible rather than being silently reassigned. The map is a selected practice route; omitted questions/subparts still retain their full canonical records.
Two printed classifications also need care: Discussion6(c) appears in both the logarithmic and trigonometric rows, but its working uses the cosecant-squared reverse chain rule; Review14 appears under parts, but its requested method is partial fractions. Follow the linked working for the actual method.
Practice questions
Practice section 1 · Questions 1–6
Reverse chain rules, powers, logarithms and exponentials
Practice section 2 · Questions 7–12
Exponential, inverse-trigonometric and logarithmic standard forms
Practice section 3 · Questions 13–18
Partial fractions, denominator derivatives and trigonometric composites
Practice section 4 · Questions 19–24
Trigonometric identities and substitution
Practice section 5 · Questions 25–30
Integration by parts, given derivatives and direct integrals
Practice section 6 · Questions 31–36
Mixed methods: standard forms, partial fractions, trigonometry, substitution and parts
Practice section 7 · Questions 37–42
Combining given derivatives, trigonometric identities and parts
Practice section 8 · Questions 43–48
Substitution, trigonometric identities and derivative-assisted parts
- Expand after the specified linear substitution
- Use a shown antiderivative inside integration by parts
- Transform a square-root integral and reverse an exponential chain
- Apply double-angle and product-to-sum identities before integrating
- Complete a square after substitution and use a product derivative
- Use the prescribed cosine substitution in a difference of squares
Practice section 9 · Questions 49–54
Choosing between standard forms, partial fractions and repeated parts
- Reverse an arctangent chain and use a principal sine substitution
- Choose among inner derivatives, completed squares and parts
- Split a numerator into a denominator derivative and a remainder
- Split the numerator and complete the square under a radical
- Find partial fractions and integrate each term
- Solve a returning integration-by-parts equation in two ways
Practice section 10 · Question 55
Compare integration by parts with an arctangent substitution
More practice
Explain why your chosen method simplifies the integral, track the variable and domain, and differentiate the final expression before accepting it.
Ready to try this on your own?
For “Techniques of integration”, try a question without the working and explain your method. This records your confidence, saved in this browser only.