Unit 2 of 12 · Sequences and series
Work with arithmetic progressions
Use a constant difference, relate terms and justify an arithmetic progression.
Recognise arithmetic progressions
An arithmetic progression (AP) has a constant difference between consecutive terms:
The common difference may be positive, negative or zero. With first term , each next term is obtained by adding . The source’s Models callout connects this to quantities that repeatedly change by a fixed added amount.
The unnumbered source activity has three lists: with ; with ; and with . Its follow-up question is not an AP: the first two consecutive differences are and . A regular-looking sign pattern is not enough to establish an AP.
The source builds the general term by matching positions to additions:
| Index | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Term | … |
There are additions after the first term, so
A negative difference gives a decreasing AP; a zero difference gives a constant AP. The sign of the first term does not determine the sign of the difference.
Use the arithmetic nth-term formula
Example 5 retains both complete first-term/difference/formula rows. For , and . For , and . Self-Practice 2 then substitutes specified indices using .
The next examples ask three different questions:
- Find a term (Example 6): identify and evaluate .
- Count terms (Example 7): treat the final value 3 as and solve . The result is terms, including both endpoints. Eighteen is the number of gaps.
- Recover the progression (Example 8): translate the third and tenth terms into and . Subtraction gives , hence and .
In a counting problem, the resulting index must be a positive integer and really produce the stated final term. For sums of many terms, use the AP and GP sum formulas in the later methods.
Prove a progression and relate three terms
An AP test must work for every neighbouring pair in the stated domain:
where the difference is independent of . Equivalently, where both terms exist. This is also a recurrence relation. Checking the first two differences alone does not prove the claim for an infinite sequence.
The source challenges an argument for : its first terms are , and their two consecutive differences are . The conclusion that this is an AP is true, but that finite check is not a valid proof. Use the general neighbouring terms instead:
The general calculation completes the printed explanation. For three consecutive AP terms , equating the two differences gives
The middle term is the arithmetic mean of its neighbours. This relation is useful when an AP problem gives information about three successive terms.
Try these examples
Open an example in chapter practice. Try it first, then read its solution. Use “Learn this step” to return to this unit.