Porisma
An honest ledger

Coverage & provenance · Applications of differentiation

All coverage topics · Student practice

Indexing is not transcription, and transcription is not mathematical review. This page keeps those stages visible.

18Extracted numbered groups
18Authored explanations
18Recorded mathematical reviews
0Await authored conversion

18 of 18 groups have authored prompts and authored interactive lessons; 0 await conversion. 18 have mathematical review recorded. Review includes documented qualifications where the printed source is inconsistent or depends on an unstated assumption. This is a first authoring and mathematical review pass, not independent expert certification. Difficulty ratings remain unassigned. The ledger below distinguishes these states.

Inventory reconciliation: Inequalities Q13–14 are on question PDF page 3, printed page 22. Their extra indentation caused the initial scan to stop at Q12. The corrected topic count is 14 and the overall count is 248; original source bytes are unchanged.

Open source review →

Collection-wide source ledger

248 complete-source articles and 15 topic metadata articles cover 468 original page instances. Source transcription, mathematical review and browser acceptance are recorded separately.

Download the native page-by-item ledger →

Topic ledger

Question, answer, review and source-page counts for each topic.
TopicGroupsAuthored explanationsMaths reviewSource pages
06 · Applications of differentiation1818 / 1818 / 189 question / 29 solution

Source qualifications and cautions

The original pages remain unchanged. Corrections, interpretation choices and necessary domain conditions are recorded alongside the authored working.

06-01 · reviewed

An undefined slope is not automatically a vertical tangent at every singularity. Here the nonzero implicit gradient verifies it.

Read the question and explanations →
06-02 · reviewed with nonzero-parameter qualification

The answer list prints only one sign in part (iii); both x-axis intersections require a normal. Closedness supplies the unstated n≠0 condition.

Read the question and explanations →
06-03 · reviewed

Dividing by b would lose the two horizontal normals.

Read the question and explanations →
06-04 · reviewed

ln(x²) is defined for negative x too; replacing it by 2ln x discards the branch containing Q.

Read the question and explanations →
06-05 · reviewed

A tangent can touch at one parameter and intersect again elsewhere; do not infer the second meeting from tangency alone.

Read the question and explanations →
06-06 · reviewed with source-domain discrepancy

Printed greatest value assumes an unstated domain restriction. Keep the local answer and unrestricted conclusion distinct.

Read the question and explanations →
06-07 · reviewed

The Cartesian equation alone includes an unattained origin; retain a≠0. Do not divide by t(t+2) when deriving a formula valid at horizontal tangents.

Read the question and explanations →
06-08 · reviewed

The midpoint locus is not an ordinary ellipse in x,y: reciprocal coordinates satisfy the ellipse identity.

Read the question and explanations →
06-09 · reviewed

Do not integrate from t=0 as if the entire path and axis enclosed one positive region; the early curve doubles back in x.

Read the question and explanations →
06-10 · reviewed

Use degree mode for this model. The approaching target travels towards the origin, so its distance decreases.

Read the question and explanations →
06-11 · reviewed

Using x+1 for the outer base side misses one wall; using h+2 adds a lid the design does not have.

Read the question and explanations →
06-12 · reviewed

Do not count the joined circular cone base as exposed area, and do not omit the floor.

Read the question and explanations →
06-13 · reviewed

The surface-area bound is a limiting value for nonzero cylinder height; distinguish a supremum from an attained maximum.

Read the question and explanations →
06-14 · reviewed

Do not mistake the interior stationary maximum for the minimum on a closed interval.

Read the question and explanations →
06-15 · reviewed

The printed range A>−1/27 must be read alongside its original A≠0 assumption. At the discriminant boundary the derivative is 0/0.

Read the question and explanations →
06-16 · reviewed

Radius changes as the water rises; it is not the constant full-container radius 9 cm.

Read the question and explanations →
06-17 · reviewed

The source line has x=2y+4, not 2y+2; one intermediate printed line contains the latter typo but its final Q is correct.

Read the question and explanations →
06-18 · reviewed

The shrinking cylinder height makes the radius increase; keep dx/dt negative.

Read the question and explanations →

Series expansion topic 09 has byte-identical question and solution PDFs. Their printed solutions are transcribed once; the provenance ledger accounts for both file instances.

Exam references

2025 TJC H2 Maths (9758), JC2 MSM. Individual exam references are retained on question pages; original question and solution page numbers are kept independently. Source margin notes, short keys, tables and diagrams are transcribed into native articles. All 468 original page instances map to 2,703 native item records. Diagrams are source-specific D3 SVGs.

Owner reports that the source contributor has permission to republish. Original attribution and source-page provenance are retained. Originals are preserved privately for quality checks and are excluded from the delivered site.

Byte verification

Original ZIP: 11,692,621 bytes.

SHA-256: 39645f7e5aee1f8d870eca9267920157747d43725a1cc8b0486cb43ca532b1cc

30 PDFs / 468 PDF pages. Every PDF has its own byte length and SHA-256 in the manifest.

Download full ingestion manifest

Question-by-question status

Conversion, mathematical review and original question PDF page for every numbered group.
QuestionConversionMathematical reviewQuestion PDF pages
06-01 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed1
06-02 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed with nonzero-parameter qualification1
06-03 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed1
06-04 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed1
06-05 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed2
06-06 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed with source-domain discrepancy2
06-07 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed2
06-08 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed3
06-09 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed3
06-10 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed4
06-11 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed5
06-12 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed5
06-13 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed6
06-14 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed6
06-15 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed6
06-16 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed7
06-17 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed7
06-18 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed8