Porisma
An honest ledger

Coverage & provenance · Series expansion

All coverage topics · Student practice

Indexing is not transcription, and transcription is not mathematical review. This page keeps those stages visible.

23Extracted numbered groups
23Authored explanations
23Recorded mathematical reviews
0Await authored conversion

23 of 23 groups have authored prompts and authored interactive lessons; 0 await conversion. 23 have mathematical review recorded. Review includes documented qualifications where the printed source is inconsistent or depends on an unstated assumption. This is a first authoring and mathematical review pass, not independent expert certification. Difficulty ratings remain unassigned. The ledger below distinguishes these states.

Inventory reconciliation: Inequalities Q13–14 are on question PDF page 3, printed page 22. Their extra indentation caused the initial scan to stop at Q12. The corrected topic count is 14 and the overall count is 248; original source bytes are unchanged.

Open source review →

Collection-wide source ledger

248 complete-source articles and 15 topic metadata articles cover 468 original page instances. Source transcription, mathematical review and browser acceptance are recorded separately.

Download the native page-by-item ledger →

Topic ledger

Question, answer, review and source-page counts for each topic.
TopicGroupsAuthored explanationsMaths reviewSource pages
09 · Series expansion2323 / 2323 / 2327 question / 27 solution · identical files

Source qualifications and cautions

The original pages remain unchanged. Corrections, interpretation choices and necessary domain conditions are recorded alongside the authored working.

09-01 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-02 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers. Source p.2 has a product-line typo (1−2x) in place of (1+2x); the actual binomial expansion and result use the plus sign.

Read the question and explanations →
09-03 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-04 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-05 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-06 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-07 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-08 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-09 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-10 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-11 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-12 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-13 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-14 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-15 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-16 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-17 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-18 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-19 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-20 · reviewed

The rendered question requests two derivative-series terms, not three. The earlier compact transcription misread this request; it has been corrected during the complete native audit. The printed two-term solution is not missing a requested term. The quadratic integral estimate is a truncation, without a small-error guarantee over the full interval.

Read the question and explanations →
09-21 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-22 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →
09-23 · reviewed

Both Topic 09 PDFs are identical and include full solutions beside the questions; opening source pages reveals answers.

Read the question and explanations →

Series expansion topic 09 has byte-identical question and solution PDFs. Their printed solutions are transcribed once; the provenance ledger accounts for both file instances.

Exam references

2025 TJC H2 Maths (9758), JC2 MSM. Individual exam references are retained on question pages; original question and solution page numbers are kept independently. Source margin notes, short keys, tables and diagrams are transcribed into native articles. All 468 original page instances map to 2,703 native item records. Diagrams are source-specific D3 SVGs.

Owner reports that the source contributor has permission to republish. Original attribution and source-page provenance are retained. Originals are preserved privately for quality checks and are excluded from the delivered site.

Byte verification

Original ZIP: 11,692,621 bytes.

SHA-256: 39645f7e5aee1f8d870eca9267920157747d43725a1cc8b0486cb43ca532b1cc

30 PDFs / 468 PDF pages. Every PDF has its own byte length and SHA-256 in the manifest.

Download full ingestion manifest

Question-by-question status

Conversion, mathematical review and original question PDF page for every numbered group.
QuestionConversionMathematical reviewQuestion PDF pages
09-01 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed1
09-02 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed2
09-03 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed3
09-04 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed3
09-05 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed4
09-06 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed5
09-07 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed6
09-08 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed7
09-09 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed8
09-10 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed10
09-11 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed11
09-12 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed12
09-13 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed13
09-14 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed14
09-15 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed15
09-16 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed16
09-17 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed18
09-18 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed20
09-19 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed22
09-20 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed22
09-21 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed24
09-22 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed25
09-23 · Source reviewauthoredreviewed26