Porisma

Original question & working

An exponential height law makes the rod never land · source reference

[2012/HCI/I/8] · Question pp. 3 · Working pp. 13

Open the interactive lesson

The working and teaching notes are included in the interactive lesson.

View source review notes
Full original question, working & notes

Printed question

Jesse leans a 6 metre rod XY in the position as shown below. At time tt seconds, the two ends X and Y are xx and yy metres from O respectively.

(i) State an equation relating xx and yy. [1]

As the rod slips, Jesse proposes that yy decreases at a rate proportional to yy.

(ii) Based on Jesse’s proposal, show that dxdt=k(36−x2)x\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{k(36-x^2)}x, where kk is a constant. [3]

Initially, X is 4 metres from O. Take k=2k=2.

(iii) Find an expression for xx in terms of tt and find the time taken for Y to be 3 metres from O from the instance Jesse lets go of the rod, giving your answer to 1 decimal place. [5]

(iv) Sketch the graph of xx against tt. Hence, comment on whether Jesse’s proposed model is appropriate. Justify your answer. [3]

[2012/HCI/I/8]

Printed working

x2+y2=36x^2+y^2=36.

dy/dt=−kydy/dt=-ky, k>0k>0. Differentiate x2+y2=36x^2+y^2=36: 2x dx/dt+2y dy/dt=02x\,dx/dt+2y\,dy/dt=0.

dx/dt=−(y/x)dy/dt=−(y/x)(−ky)=ky2/x=k(36−x2)/xdx/dt=-(y/x)dy/dt=-(y/x)(-ky)=ky^2/x=k(36-x^2)/x.

With k=2k=2, ∫x/(36−x2)dx=∫2dt\int x/(36-x^2)dx=\int2dt.

−12∫(−2x)/(36−x2)dx=∫2dt-\frac12\int(-2x)/(36-x^2)dx=\int2dt; −12ln⁡(36−x2)=2t+C-\frac12\ln(36-x^2)=2t+C since 36−x2>036-x^2>0.

ln⁡(36−x2)=−4t+C′\ln(36-x^2)=-4t+C'; 36−x2=Ae−4t36-x^2=Ae^{-4t}, A=eC′A=e^{C'}; x2=36−Ae−4tx^2=36-Ae^{-4t}; x=36−Ae−4tx=\sqrt{36-Ae^{-4t}} since x>0x>0.

At 0, x=4x=4: 4=36−A⇒A=204=\sqrt{36-A}\Rightarrow A=20. Thus x=36−20e−4tx=\sqrt{36-20e^{-4t}}.

For y=3y=3, x=36−9=27x=\sqrt{36-9}=\sqrt{27}; 27=36−20e−4t⇒e−4t=9/2027=36-20e^{-4t}\Rightarrow e^{-4t}=9/20; t=−14ln⁡(9/20)=0.2t=-\frac14\ln(9/20)=0.2 s (1 d.p.).

The source sketch starts at x=4x=4, approaches asymptote x=6x=6 for t≥0t\ge0. Based on Jesse’s model, xx will never be 6: the rod would never fall flat. Thus the model is not appropriate.

Printed answer key

(i) x2+y2=36x^2+y^2=36. (iii) x=36−Ae−4tx=\sqrt{36-Ae^{-4t}}; 0.2 s. (iv) No; native sketch below.

Teacher note 1

Since yy decreases as tt increases, dy/dt<0dy/dt<0. Since y>0y>0, the constant of proportionality is negative for dy/dt<0dy/dt<0.

Teacher note 2

Given a DE of form dx/dt=f(x)dx/dt=f(x), rearrange before integrating with respect to tt: 1f(x)dxdt=1\frac1{f(x)}\frac{dx}{dt}=1, hence ∫1f(x)dx=∫1dt\int\frac1{f(x)}dx=\int1dt.

Teacher note 3

Note t≥0t\ge0; do not sketch any curve for t<0t<0.

Diagram 10-10-rod

Slipping rod XY

X is left of O, Y above O; right-angle square and x,y,6 labels retained.

Diagram 10-10-solution

Position of the lower rod end

Mathematical review

(i) x2+y2=36x^2+y^2=36. (ii) Differentiation gives xx′+yy′=0xx'+yy'=0, hence x′=ky2/x=k(36−x2)/xx'=ky^2/x=k(36-x^2)/x.

(iii) With k=2, ∫x/(36−x2) dx=2t+C\int x/(36-x^2)\,dx=2t+C, so 36−x2=Ae−4t36-x^2=Ae^{-4t}. Initial x=4 gives A=20. Thus x=36−20e−4tx=\sqrt{36-20e^{-4t}} for t≥0, with y=20e−2ty=\sqrt{20}e^{-2t}. At y=3, e−4t=9/20e^{-4t}=9/20, so t=14ln⁡(20/9)≈0.1996t=\tfrac14\ln(20/9)\approx0.1996, or 0.2 s.

(iv) x starts at 4, increases concavely toward the asymptote x=6. Since y never reaches zero at finite t, this model predicts the rod never lies flat, a limitation for an actual slipping rod.

Provenance

TJC JC2 2025 H2 Maths (9758) MSM. Native transcription checked against original visible question, working and sidebars. Question page(s): 3. Working page(s): 13. Original records remain private for QA; this native article has no PDF or raster worksheet dependency.